UGT is always asked, "what's cheaper?"; our usual reply of course is "we are, but do you mean less expensive?". If the contractor or municipality looks at the real cost shown above, UGT will beat the current methods by 20 to 30%. Although UGT's material cost are higher, our labor cost are lower and the burden and overhead is reduced. No matter how you calculate burden, by either time or revenue, the increased effiecieny will reduce burden and overhead cost. Here are some other condiderations:

• Longer manhole life.
• No heavy equipment which saves on landscaping replacement cost.
• Less Manpower
• Less Reliant on expensive equipment which could be used elsewhere.
• Less baracading time.
• Reduction of Workmans Compensation

The cost avoidance in the UGT system speaks for itself. The real question should be, "What solution is more cost effective?" The answer is the UGT system! Check out some of the comparitive studies:

• Brick & Mortar
• HDPE Rings
• Outer INI Sealant